US–Vietnam Trade Deal Boosts Tech, Wall Street Hits Records

On July 2, the United States and Vietnam reached a new trade agreement that will impose a 20% tariff on Vietnamese imports. This rate is significantly lower than the 46% tariff that President Trump had implemented in early April (Kiderlin, 2025). Meanwhile, U.S. exports to Vietnam will not face any tariffs. This agreement is part of a broader strategy aimed at reshaping supply chains, particularly in response to concerns regarding Chinese transshipment through Southeast Asia. Markets reached all-time highs almost immediately. The Nasdaq increased by 0.94%, while the S&P 500 rose by 0.47%, driven by gains in technology stocks and the recent trade agreement (Valle, 2025). Major players in the tech sector, such as Apple, Nvidia, and Tesla, fueled much of this upward movement. Additionally, Nike saw significant gains as investors anticipated that its apparel manufacturing in Vietnam would benefit from stable tariff outcomes (Kessel, 2025). The recent trade pact has shown that investors are still eager for any positive policy signals, particularly those that address global trade risks. Beyond the headline figures, this deal gives reassurance to sectors that are closely tied to manufacturing and sensitive to supply chains. However, while tariff cuts lift sentiment, deeper structural uncertainty remains. The agreement does not prevent potential future escalations, especially with China closely observing the situation. Looking ahead, enthusiasm in the market might diminish unless we see more friction in actual trade flows. For now, the Nasdaq and S&P continue their upward trend, but investors should be aware that this boost could be temporary and sentiment-driven rather than fundamentally transformative. Without clearer earnings and inflation data, investors may shift from technology stocks to cyclical and industrial sectors if valuation concerns increase.

U.S. June Jobs Report: Resilient Labor Market Delays Fed Policy Shift

On July 3, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that the economy added 147,000 jobs in June, significantly surpassing the forecast of approximately 110,000 (Wallace, 2025). Additionally, the annual unemployment rate decreased from 4.2% to 4.1% (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2025). The most substantial job gains were observed in healthcare and state and local government, while the federal government experienced a loss of 7,000 jobs. Excluding public sector hiring, which saw a net gain of 73,000 jobs, private sector employers added only 74,000 jobs in June, marking the weakest increase since October 2024 (Wallace, 2025). This slowdown suggests that businesses are hiring fewer people than before, despite the overall numbers appearing strong. That signals that companies may be becoming more cautious due to cost pressures, slower demand, or economic uncertainty, despite total employment appearing solid on the surface. Additionally, the Bureau stated that average hourly earnings rose by 0.2% month-over-month and 3.7% year-over year, suggesting that wage-driven inflation remains moderate (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2025). However, temporary help services lost 2,600 jobs (Morrison, 2025). This is important because when companies start to worry about costs or demand, the first thing they usually cut is temporary workers, not permanent staff. Likewise, average weekly hours dropped by 0.1-0.2% (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2025). This can be a sign that businesses are cutting back without
fully laying people off yet. Markets reacted quickly to the June jobs report, with the S&P 500 and Nasdaq both reaching new record highs. The S&P rose by approximately 0.8%, while the Nasdaq increased by about 1.0%, driven by optimism surrounding labor market strength (Wisnefski, 2025). In contrast, the bond markets showed a different story: the yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury surged from 4.26% to around 4.35% as investors rapidly adjusted their expectations for interest rate cuts this summer (Wisnefski, 2025). Following the June jobs report, the likelihood of a rate cut in July has dropped significantly, now standing at just 4.7%. Instead, attention has shifted to September, where the likelihood now sits just below 70%, and October and December, where expectations climb above 80% and 90%, respectively (CME Group, n.d.). These figures suggest growing confidence in delayed easing, as long as inflation stays around the target. This labor report builds directly on what we highlighted last week. The Federal Reserve is not in a hurry to implement cuts. Following Richmond Fed President Barkin’s warning that new tariffs could drive prices higher, we pointed out that inflation risks are shifting from demand factors to cost structures. At that time, the likelihood of a cut in July was already diminishing. Now, with the release of this strong jobs report, even a September move looks vulnerable. The Fed may prefer to wait for more definitive signs of disinflation before taking action, particularly if labor markets continue to remain tight. The message from the Fed has been consistent that they will react to data, not speculation.
Currently, the data does not indicate an urgent need to cut rates. There are indeed some signs of softness in the economy, such as a decline in temporary help employment, which often reflects early caution from employers, and a slight decrease in average weekly hours, suggesting that some businesses might be reducing labor usage before resorting to layoffs. But these shifts remain marginal while headline numbers are holding steady. In fact, the labor market seems to be helping the Fed by slowing enough to reduce inflation pressures without causing a broader downturn. The implications of the June jobs report are significant. For investors, it reinforces the view that interest rates are likely to remain high, especially if the upcoming Consumer Price Index (CPI) data in July does not indicate significant improvement. This situation would lead to tighter credit conditions throughout the third quarter, offering only a little relief to rate-sensitive sectors like housing and small-cap companies, which tend to perform better when borrowing costs decline. Higher mortgage rates continue to burden homebuyers and developers, and smaller companies, which are more vulnerable to borrowing costs, may find it challenging to maintain profit margins or finance expansion efforts. Additionally, Treasury market volatility could increase, particularly if economic data continues to fluctuate between signs of strength and weakness. More broadly, the report does not suggest the economy is overheating, yet it does reduce the urgency for policy action. The Fed can afford to wait, and markets may need to anchor expectations. Rate cuts are still on the table, but the timeline has likely shifted. Unless inflation shows a significant decline, October or even December may now become the realistic timeframe for a policy shift. In this environment, the Fed appears content to watch and wait, and investors would be wise to do the same.

Corporate Layoffs Surge Across Sectors

This week, a wave of layoffs escalated across major corporations in the tech, finance, energy, and retail sectors. Microsoft announced approximately 9,000 job cuts, which is around 4% of its global workforce, as the company reorganizes around artificial intelligence and streamlines its management structure (Herzlich, 2025). Other industry giants, such as Meta, Morgan Stanley, BP, Bumble, and Adidas, have also implemented or planned to implement significant workforce reductions. According to a recent World Economic Forum (2025) survey, about 40% of companies worldwide expect to reduce their workforces over the next five years due to the rise of artificial intelligence.

Markets responded cautiously to the increase in layoffs. On the day the news broke, the stock dipped slightly, indicating that investors support the strategy, perceiving the cuts as signs of “discipline” and “efficiency” (Wood, 2025). While investor sentiment remains relatively stable, largely thanks to positive news regarding jobs and trade, overall confidence could be undermined if layoffs continue to rise or spread into consumer-facing sectors.

This wave of workforce reductions indicates that companies are prioritizing cost efficiencies, particularly through AI-driven automation and organizational streamlining. It reflects a corporate environment increasingly skeptical of near-term economic stability, opting to recalibrate rather than expand. Some companies conduct layoffs to boost earnings, while others aim to maintain their current earnings, which are at risk of declining due to global uncertainties.

Looking ahead, there are two main risks to consider. First, sustained layoffs, particularly in high wage sectors such as finance and technology, could lead to a decrease in wage inflation, which may reduce consumer spending power. Second, if layoffs begin to affect a wider range of sectors, they might be perceived less as efficiency measures and more as a reaction to declining demand. This perception could raise concerns about future revenues and put pressure on corporate earnings, potentially dampening investor confidence.

Ultimately, whether these layoffs are seen as smart adjustments or as early warnings will depend on how demand holds up for the rest of the year. For now, markets appear to perceive these layoffs as a forward-thinking strategy rather than a crisis response. However, if the narrative shifts from efficiency to fragility, sentiment could change rapidly. In this environment, perception may be just as important as payroll numbers. This means that how investors interpret corporate actions — whether as signs of confidence or caution — could influence market trends more than the actual data itself.

References
CME Group. (n.d.). FedWatch Tool. Retrieved July 3, 2025, from https://www.cmegroup.com/markets/interest-rates/cme-fedwatch-tool.html

Herzlich, T. (2025, July 2). Microsoft to slash 9,000 jobs in latest brutal cut amid AI push: report. New York Post. Retrieved July 3, 2025, from
https://nypost.com/2025/07/02/business/microsoft-to-slash-9000-jobs-in-latest-brutal-cut amid-ai-push-report/

Kessel, A. (2025, July 2). Nike and Other Retail Stocks Climb as Trump Strikes Trade Deal With Vietnam. Investopedia. Retrieved July 3, 2025, from https://www.investopedia.com/nike and-other-retail-stocks-climb-as-trump-strikes-trade-deal-with-vietnam-11765793

Kiderlin, S. (2025, July 3). What the U.S.-Vietnam trade deal tells us about the future of tariffs. CNBC. Retrieved July 3, 2025, from https://www.cnbc.com/2025/07/03/what-the us-vietnam-trade-deal-tells-us-about-the-future-of-tariffs.html

Morrison, K. (2025, July 3). June Employment Reports: BLS Shows Steady Growth While ADP Reports First Losses Since 2020. StaffingHub. Retrieved July 3, 2025, from https://staffinghub.com/hiring/june-employment-reports-bls-shows-steady-growth-while adp-reports-first-losses-since-2020/

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2025, July 3). Employment Situation Summary (PDF). Retrieved July 3, 2025, from https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf

Valle, S. (2025, July 2). S&P 500, Nasdaq close on record high on Vietnam trade deal, tech stocks. Reuters. Retrieved July 3, 2025, from https://www.reuters.com/business/futures inch-higher-investors-eye-trade-deals-payrolls-data-2025-07-02/

Wallace, A. (2025, July 3). The US economy added a stronger-than-expected 147,000 jobs in June and the unemployment rate fell to 4.1%. CNN. Retrieved 3 July, 2025, from https://edition.cnn.com/2025/07/03/economy/us-jobs-report-june-final

Wisnefski, S. (2025, July 3). Dow Jones Today: S&P 500, Nasdaq Close at Fresh Record Highs After Strong June Jobs Report as Tech Stocks Continue to Rally. Investopedia. Retrieved July 3, 2025, from https://www.investopedia.com/dow-jones-today-07032025-11765983

Wood, R. (2025, July 3). Microsoft’s 2025 Layoffs and its All-In Bet on an AI-Powered Future. TimeTrex. Retrieved July 3, 2025, from https://www.timetrex.com/blog/microsoft layoffs-2025/

World Economic Forum. (2025, January 7). The Future of Jobs Report 2025: Digest. World Economic Forum. Retrieved July 3, 2025, from https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-jobs-report-2025/digest/